The
Dadaist movement was born out of the negative reaction to the horrors of World
War I, and as a reactant to the conceptual standards of art in the modern
world. The goal of Dada artists was to mock the meaninglessness of that world
and question the notion of art itself. They did this by challenging the
perception of the viewer, leaving their pieces open to interpretation. Dadaists
relied on chance rather than inflicting meaning into their works, making the
movement less of a movement and more of a game. Being a byproduct and critical
response by nature, this “game” was anti-war as well as anti-bourgeois. Its
unruliness was a sort of mimic to the chaos and collapse of bourgeois cultural
values, which crumbled due to the destruction of war. Surrealism, which came
later, was also a movement to work against the cultural values and social
construct of the time. They imposed a revolution to break away from the
expectations of these standards. Although not directly associated with the
Dadaists, Marcel Duchamp played a very important role in sharing their goals
and challenging order and art.
Duchamp’s
piece, Fountain, is a prime example
of the disarray of Dada. It is simply a urinal turned on its side with his
signature. With its release in 1917 came scandal. Duchamp had submitted this
piece into a jury-free exhibition, meaning that anyone was able to enter the
show. Yet, somehow, the show’s committee rejected it, which drew attention. In
turn, Duchamp published a defense in rebuttal to what the exhibition had done,
expressing his feelings and theories concerning the basis of art. He raised
questions on what qualified as art, having no part in its production other than
the concept driving it. Could readymade or found objects be considered art? Who
is to define art in the first place? I don’t believe in art as a concrete
practice. Nobody has the authority to determine what constitutes a piece of
art, and therefore, anything can be considered art. I also don’t think that the
artist must physically make his piece to be considered an artist. If anything
is an art, this includes ideas. With these in mind, anybody can be an artist.
This is what Duchamp and other Dada artists wanted people to realize. If there
is to be peace in the world, we must not take things so seriously.
These are the boundaries that Marcel Duchamp was attempting to push with his works, invoking thought and seeking reaction. Even if his pieces are being criticized in a negative way, that person is still criticizing them as art. Even if they are to say, “That’s not art.” In this way, it was impossible for Duchamp to ever fail. His creative ingeniousness reshaped the form, content, and concept of art.
These are the boundaries that Marcel Duchamp was attempting to push with his works, invoking thought and seeking reaction. Even if his pieces are being criticized in a negative way, that person is still criticizing them as art. Even if they are to say, “That’s not art.” In this way, it was impossible for Duchamp to ever fail. His creative ingeniousness reshaped the form, content, and concept of art.
I often think that if many of the Cubist arts were anti-war and anti-capitalist, then these artists could have been the very first 'hippies'. They opposed the war, their governments, and wanted to look inwards as opposed to the surface details.
ReplyDeleteI do agree with you nobody really has the authority to say something is art or its not art. I also feel that taking a ready-made object and calling it your own is okay. I feel that it was someone else’s creation and Duchamp changed it slightly and called it his own. But I do think that he was making a good point to bringing mundane objects to be seen more closely and to have people have a different perspective on them.
ReplyDeleteI appreciate Duchamp for his ideas, but I am a little bothered by the fact that we have studied phenomenally talented artists over these courses, and now we see Duchamp in our textbooks, who doesn't even create his own work. I agree with you that no one really has the authority to call something art, but I at least feel that the artist needs the combination of technical skill, talent, and an idea to create a real work of art.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree that artists don't need to physically make their works of art in order for it to be considered art. I am a firm believer in the idea that everything should be considered art, and that things should not be taken too seriously. Duchamp did such a great job of illustrating both these ideas by pushing artistic boundaries, and by adding humor to create controversial pieces.
ReplyDelete