Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The Birth of Venus


            Sandro Botticelli’s painting, Birth of Venus, is a prime example of the impending naturalism and realism that appears in Renaissance Art. The piece, which is quite popular among Renaissance Art, not to mention pretty famous in general, depicts Venus—the Roman Goddess of love—emerging from the sea on a shell. Two Zephyrs (symbols of spiritual passions) are blowing her toward shore while roses shower on her from the left. On the right, Horae—one of the goddesses of seasons—quickly swoops in with a cloak for Venus to cover herself with. The placement of all these figures in the composition makes it very well balanced, as they are the focal points and only subjects in the piece with a sense of gravity.
            Botticelli’s Venus is said to be derived from Praxiteles’ Aphrodite of Knidos, which is a Greek statue from the High Classical Period. Praxiteles’ piece is important because it is the first major art piece representing a female nude, being Aphrodite as she places her robes to bathe. Venus, being a goddess of love and born of the ocean, is also nude. Art representing the nude female holds a sort of sexual charge that art with male nudes does not have. This is likely because the female form is symbolic of beauty; it is fragile and treasured, which might be why the Venus attempts to cover her sexual parts. However, this “modest” Venus is a recurring theme in some pieces portraying not only the goddess, but also other females in the history of art. Even though Venus is trying to cover herself, she brings more attention to her situation and creates more tension. Praxiteles’ Aphrodite is not covered as much, and therefore lessens the sexual charge. Yet both of these figures are very similar and are portrayed in a contrapposto stance, which contributes to the naturalism of the subject. Like the Birth of Venus, much of Renaissance art is drawn from classicism of the Greek Era. This notion makes sense because artists build on each other’s work and these prior works are incredibly naturalistic with their portrayal of the human figure.
            The diagonals represented by the Zephyrs and Horae ignite a sense of anticipation, in turn creating action in the painting. The wind, even though unseen, is almost felt through this piece. It adds to the movement of the content, from the billowing gown Horae rushes to Venus, Venus’ flowing golden locks of hair, the roses fluttering down, to the mouths of the Zephyr angels whom created it all. The wind is also represented by the visible waves on the surface of the infinite turquoise ocean. This adds some depth and brings the eye into the background, where Venus likely came from. This action is consistent throughout the painting, as if Botticelli tells a story using only a picture. The viewer can easily imagine what might have happened before the event depicted, as well as what is about to happen afterward. However it is a moment frozen in time, much like a photograph, that contains a forever-active scene.
            As a whole, the Birth of Venus piece emits energy through utilizing diagonals, representing wind various ways, and making use of a bright and attractive color scheme. However, after viewing the work, I am left with a feeling of serenity, but also even a slight sense of apprehension due to the liveliness and Venus’ situation.

5 comments:

  1. This image to me was a very calm piece. Although there is movement it seems light and airy. Venus's hair is gently flowing as she moves ashore. Fabrics are wispy and rippled making the scene believable that it is by the sea.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello Evan, I enjoyed your analysis of this painting. After looking at it for myself It is easy to find my way around it with the groundwork that you gave and I agree it is a very dynamic and sexually charged piece. I was trapped in the thought of how it would have been perceived at the time. Even now it seems very abrupt and emotional with the nude poses, I cant help but imagine how people viewed it at the time, it must have been a challenging and even risky composition to put in the publics eye.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Evan, I find the "pudica" venus really fascinating. I am an oil painter myself and I love painting women...nude, actually. A woman's body is much more seducing and fragile than a man's and I think it's so captivating. I posted a blog about Masaccio's Expulsion of Adam and Eve, and Eve is painted as if she were the Venus. It is quite interesting!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how the forms of Zephyrus and Horae frame and set off the figure of Venus. Their lines create an arch over her which protects and displays her at the same time. The same wind which blows Venus toward shore also blows back the robe Horae is bringing, leaving Venus a nude for a second or two after she reaches the shore.
    Greek and Roman gods and goddesses were often portrayed nude; as if being divine made modesty unnecessary. It seems that Venus, who is the goddess of love and beauty, is playing at modesty to draw attention to her nudity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really enjoy the color scheme going on in this piece. I think that it helps out a lot with the feeling of serenity that you get from it. The colors are very soft yet lively at the same time. They help to bring even more beauty to the piece. I also think that Venus is a beautiful character in art. When learning about her in Ancient Art, I found her to be so elegant in her depictions. I feel that adding Venus to any painting or piece makes it a work of beauty.

    ReplyDelete